bill james.org - Politics for the 21st Century 

Bill James.org - Charlotte's home for Conservative Republican Political Information

Posted May 17 , 2003 

CMS acknowledges investigating Becoats. Lack of confidence and anger sweep School Board 

Did Choice Plan guru sell CMS data? Have others?

School Board Member Gauvreau is only board member to ask for investigation (see below)

Superintendent Pughsley issues two memos ordering (then restricting) the investigation to only Becoats

Closed Session meeting said to be a barn burner but details not known (yet)

Observer Editorial supports Gauvreau's call for an investigation

Will CMS restrict investigation or disclose all those engaging in possible sale of CMS data/self-dealing?

 


 

Here's the scoop :

  • NBC broke this story about a week ago with allegations that CMS' choice plan guru had been selling CMS data to other school districts.


  • These stories prompted CMS School Board member Larry Gauvreau to request an investigation. Many CMS school Board members (Lee Kindberg - R, George Dunlap - D) and Dr. Pughsley dismissed any wrongdoing or the need for an investigation. Tempers were running hot.


  • NBC6 disclosed that PowerPoint presentations sold to Little Rock School District appeared to be developed by CMS staff at taxpayer expense.


  • NBC6 disclosed that Dr. Becoats consulting business generated its business leads from his desk at CMS (Little Rock called Dr. Pughsley first and then Dr. Becoats at CMS).


  • CMS School Board member Gauvreau issues a letter asking for an investigation about all staff and their employment activity but specifically Dr. Becoats (see below).


  • School Board goes into closed session (this past Tuesday) to discuss a "personnel matter" in what is said to be a barn burner of a meeting. This meeting was so bizarre that I don't even know the details but rumors abound about it.


  • CMS School Board majority initially objects to any investigation and to Gauvreau's request.


  • Observer editorial Comment on 5-16-2003 calls for in investigation: "The larger issue is this: The public needs to know it can have confidence in what Charlotte-Mecklenburg school officials say and do. That's why it's important to settle another allegation that is raising some eyebrows -- whether administrator Eric Becoats, who helped develop the schools' new assignment plan, improperly used school property or time in his consulting business."


  • Dr. Pughsley and Dr. Rembert relent and agree to ask the School Board's attorney to investigate. First Dr. Pughsley asks the School Board Attorney to investigate ALL professional staff and their outside employment/consulting activity and then STRANGELY Dr. Pughsley issues a follow up letter (see below) attempting to restrict Mr. Green's investigation to only Becoats (see memo below).


  • Insiders, say that the reason for the second letter is that Mr. Becoats may not be the ONLY one selling CMS data and engaging in self-dealing and the effort was made to restrict the investigation before it covers others including the rumor goes, some school board members or others in management perhaps.


  • In short, it appears that the CMS school Board and management recognizes that they have a "problem" with Dr. Becoats but want  to stop any investigation of such matters with him.


  • If I were Dr. Becoats I would get a lawyer who can protect his rights. If everyone else is doing it, it doesn't make it right but it might be a defense of a sort to point out everyone else who is doing it.

 

 
Becoats investigation letter
 

  • -----Original Message-----
    From: Larry Gauvreau
  • Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 7:53 PM
  • Subject: Eric Beacoats, other professional staff -- outside employment activity
  • Jim --
  • Here are the facts that we need to discover in the Eric Becoats matter. The allegations are very serious and need immediate attention. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'd also like a date for the closure of this matter with answers (facts) by May 30; is that reasonable?
  • Thanks,
  • Larry
  • 1. What are the facts on Eric Becoats outside employment activities on educational matters:
    -When did the activity begin (dates) and how long has it gone on?
    -What is the extent of the activity; what are the details and how much revenue?
    -How many hours a month does Eric Beacoats devote to the activities?
    -How many employees or partners are involved?
    -What CMS resources and data were used for profits for Eric Becoats?
    -Has Eric Becoats used the services/time of other CMS employees for his business?
    -Has Eric Becoats used CMS email, phone, supplies, expenses, etc. for his outside activities?
    -Did Eric Becoats solicit his outside business? If not, how was it obtained?
    -Has Eric Becoats provided any reimbursement to CMS for resources used?
    -Who has been supervising Eric Becoats?
  • 2. What code of conduct, or other ethics policy, apply to professional education administrators/directors on their employment outside of CMS? Do any laws apply (state or federal)? In what way to they apply to the Superintendent.
  • 3. What advice, if any, have counsel for the school board given to Eric Becoats or any other CMS personnel (including Board members and Superintendent) relative to outside employment or outside business ventures? I'd like background copies of memos, emails, phone calls, etc.
  • 4. Are there any professional staff members of CMS, besides Eric Becoats, engaging in outside employment or outside business ventures which involve educational policy? I'd like those facts (just like #1 above) as well.
  • 5. To what extent, if any, have school board members utilized their office or CMS resources to earn income for themselves? Have CMS professional staff prepared data, reports, presentations, etc. for board members that were ultimately used for outside (for profit) education activities (who??) If so, aren't school board members required to disclose? Is there any surrounding law/policy on other income earned while serving in office (relative to educational matters)?
  • 6. What risk, if any, is there if taxpayer/citizens group filed legal action against the board because of the way CMS resources have been used to benefit private individuals? Is there surrounding law over this...a so-called "taxpayers action"?
  • 7. Is there any NC law to recover money from fraud? How can the CMS Board take action?
 
 

The Charlotte Observer - Posted on Sat, May. 17, 2003

CMS planner's work scrutinized
Superintendent agrees to look into Becoats' outside consulting

Staff Writers
 

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools officials are trying to decide whether the district's chief planner did anything wrong when he shared information about CMS with other districts while working as a private consultant.

The planner, Eric Becoats, was hired by school systems in Union County and Little Rock, Ark., to advise them on developing student assignment plans based on parental choice. Becoats has played a key role in building the choice-based plan that has replaced busing for desegregation in CMS this school year.

After an NBC6 report on Becoats' consulting activities, school board member Larry Gauvreau asked Superintendent James Pughsley to investigate Becoats' outside employment, and to report on broader issues of outside employment by other CMS staff and school board members.

In a memo sent Friday to CMS attorney Maurice Green and the school board, Pughsley said he and board chair Wilhelmenia Rembert agreed the investigation should focus on "issues surrounding Dr. Becoats' outside consulting activities."

Government employees who use public information for an outside consulting business are not necessarily committing an ethical or legal violation, said a UNC Chapel Hill expert.

"It would be inappropriate for him, for anyone, to be using the resources of their public employer to gain privately in a private business," said Robert Joyce, professor of public law and government at the N.C. Institute of Government. "It would be inappropriate for anyone to use letter and ink and printer and photocopier and that kind of stuff from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg school system. But I don't see anything inappropriate about using information."

CMS policy allows employees to work outside the system, as long as it does not interfere with their work for the district. The policy also prohibits employees from making a personal profit during work time.

It's unclear whether or to what extent Becoats used CMS offices or supplies to do his consulting. The consulting firm -- Queen Educational Planning -- has an address in Harrisburg.

Through CMS spokeswoman Jerri Haigler, both Becoats and Pughsley declined to comment.

The board discussed the matter in closed session Tuesday, but because it is a personnel matter, members, including Gauvreau, have declined to say what they talked about.

In an e-mail to Pughsley sent Wednesday, Gauvreau asked for details of Becoats' consulting work, including whether he has used the services and time of other CMS employees, whether he has used CMS e-mail, phones and supplies, and how he solicited his outside business.

He also asked what policies and laws cover outside employment of CMS professional staff, whether any others are involved in outside business ventures linked to educational policy, and whether board members have used CMS resources to earn money.

"Until the facts are on the table, no one's going to know anything," Gauvreau said in an interview.

Becoats' presentation to the Union County school board in August included advice on developing a choice-based student assignment system. His handout contained no description of CMS's choice-based system.

Becoats was paid $1,625, said Union County Public Schools spokeswoman Luan Ingram.

She said Union County Superintendent Jerry Thomas got Becoats' name from former CMS Superintendent Eric Smith. It was Becoats, Ingram said, who mentioned his consulting business. According to state records, the business was started in July.

In Little Rock, Becoats was paid $2,000 for a November visit, plus $1,200 in airfare, said schools spokeswoman Suellen Vann.

His presentation included a history of student assignment in CMS, successful strategies for a choice plan and a description of CMS's approach, including demographic data.

 

 
 

NBC6 - http://www.nbc6.com/news/specialreports/nbc6-051303-al-becoats.1657154d.html

CMS board discusses plans for profit following 6NEWS investigation

05/14/2003

By STUART WATSON / 6NEWS

 

*

6NEWS

Dr. Eric Becoats

The Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Board is considering whether a top school bureaucrat should make thousands of dollars through consulting using a plan the taxpayers spent millions to develop.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg taxpayers pay more than $90,000 a year for Dr. Eric Becoats to work for them. But Becoats charges thousands of dollars on the side to consult other school districts using the CMS school choice plan.

When other school districts had questions about Charlotte's choice plan, CMS Superintendent Dr. James Pughsley referred them to Becoats.

I don't see a particular conflict so long as he is not on the clock here," Pughsley said.

"He's receiving his information, his leads on his private consulting work at his taxpayer funded job in Mecklenburg County,” said Don Carrington, John Locke Foundation. “That's why you do have a conflict of interest."

School policy bars employees from soliciting customers or clients on Board of Education property.

"I'm not actively soliciting business," Becoats said.

School board member Lee Kindberg said she doesn't see a conflict.

“What they were asking him to do on his own time and vacation by the way was to explain to them what it takes to go through the process,” Kindberg said. “And because he used slides and information that were created here is not a problem.”

But board member Larry Gavreau disagrees.

"Just shows there's outside consulting work going on, using CMS data for profit and I just think that's wrong,” he said.

The investigators' Jeff Sonier broke this story. He will cover the board's closed door meeting and have a report Tuesday night at 11 p.m.