Billjames.org

 

Billjames.org Newsletter

December 8, 2007

 
 
 

Meck Demo's funny numbers (or how 'make'n every vote count' means Black Democrats are Diss'n White suburban Democrats in the Sheriffs race)

 

312 = 390 + 631


 

If there was one thing Democrats have whined about over the years since George W. Bush was elected was the refrain that he was 'selected' not 'elected'.

 

Black Democrats complained about the electoral college and Democrats in general sang We Shall Overcome while saying that 'every vote counts' and that Black voters were disenfranchised.

 

In Mecklenburg County Democrat Party rules however not all votes are equal. In particular, a Black inner-city vote is worth 5 to 10 times the value of a Suburban white vote. Even though both are Democrats, a Matthews Democrat casting a ballot has his or her vote devalued while a Black inner-city Democrat's vote is doubled, tripled, quadrupled or more depending on how 'loyal' the precinct was.

 

Since the most 'loyal' of Democrat voters are Black - they get more loyalty bonus' and those votes are effectively taken away from white Democrats in the Burbs.

 

This sort of system is accepted by White Liberals to placate their Black political brothers. Suburban Democrats don't even know they are second class citizens.

 

In the Sheriffs selection process last night there were 631 'adjusted' votes for Mackey and 390 'adjusted' votes for Deputy Chief Bailey. That is a total of 1,021 votes.

 

But there were only 312 delegates (and some weren't allowed in the room to vote from what I hear).

 

How can 312 people cast 1,021 votes?

 

Because the Democrats give inner-city Blacks extra votes.

 

Don't believe me?

 

Here are excepts from the Mecklenburg County Democrat Party Plan of Organization. Two sections are cited:

 

Section 1.08


 Demo Plan 1.08

 

Section 5.02

 

5.02 of Demo Plan

 

The Mecklenburg Democrats use this phrasing about 'Every 100 votes' equals one vote to increase the political clout of Black voters at its conventions and to reduce the clout of white Democrats in suburbia who may be less 'liberal'. It is a control process but it also discriminates against whites (intended or not).

 

The Mecklenburg GOP convention however assigns votes as one person - one vote.

 

So.....what does this mean?

 

It means that no matter what Chipp Bailey did to win over Democrats, for every voter he talked to there was a Black voter that had 10 votes to cast against him that had an agenda to elect a 'Black Sheriff'.

 

The reason that the vote of 631 to 390 was a 'landslide' is because the process was rigged.

 

Since I don't know how many of Mackey's votes were folks casting uber-ballots , no one really knows what the REAL vote was. Take 100 votes from Mackey and give them to Bailey and you get a horse race. Take 200 and Bailey wins.

 

Either way - a corrupt process and a ethically questionable candidate was 'selected' because a bunch of folks each had multiple ballots to cast and cast them based on race not character.

 

One person - one vote. Not in the Democrat Party here in Mecklenburg.

 

If the GOP applied this same process, no inner-city Black precinct delegate would get any votes.

 

Since inner-city Black precincts go for the Democrats 92% to 8% on average you can see the impact of applying these funny numbers.

 

The process was rigged. There was no way that Chipp Bailey would win in that environment because each of the key Black precinct workers in the Inner-city were casting ballots worth 10 times what the rest of Mecklenburg County's Democrats were worth.

 

Race, it seems, is so important to the Democrat process they are willing to disenfranchise white suburban Democrats to insure inner-city Blacks have complete control.

 

Considering they talk about one person one vote it should make people wonder why they don't actually use it (or why white Democrats don't object to the servitude).

 

 

 

Sincerely,

 


Bill James
Billjames.org

   
 

Copyright © 1999-2007 by Commissioner Bill James

http://billjames.org contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, genealogical and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on my site is distributed without profit. The fair use of a copyrighted work under this Section for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors normally considered and listed in the law include:

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
 
If you wish to use copyrighted material fromhttp://billjames.org  for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.