Billjames.org

 

Billjames.org Newsletter

December 15, 2008

 

 

 
Did Obama or his staff offer a bribe for 'Candidate 1'?

"what did they know and when did they know it....?"

Does a bribe have to be in 'cash' or can the promise of jobs do?

 

 

I have been thinking about this Chicago stuff and whether it has ties to President-Elect Obama.

 

 According to Merriam-Webster's dictionary a 'bribe' is defined as:

 

bribe

Function: noun Etymology: Middle English, morsel given to a beggar, bribe, from Anglo-French, morsel Date: 15th century

1 : money or favor given or promised in order to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust

2 : something that serves to induce or influence


The Gov. wasn't mad because Obama wouldn't offer him a bribe on those phone calls, he was mad because the Gov. wanted cash up front AS WELL AS the jobs for he and his wife. In short, Obama's supposed bribe wasn't enough for the Gov

 

Obama's bribe basically wasn't BIG enough to satisfy the Gov so the Gov turned to 'candidate 5' (reputed to be Jesse Jackson, Jr by ABC News) who increased the bid to a large amount of cash up front.

 
A bribe doesn't have to be in 'cash' to be breaking the law. As noted above, a 'bribe' is offering
'something that serves to induce or influence'.

 

I think that a reasonable case can be made from the wiretap summaries in the media that Obama's staff offered a bribe to the Gov (jobs in two years for he and his wife after the end of the Gov's term) but the Gov. (on the tapes) thought that was not enough so he turned to candidate 'five' (supposed to be Jesse Jackson).


The tapes show the Gov. talking about how Obama wanted that woman to take over his seat in exchange for which Obama agreed to give the Gov and his wife certain jobs at the end of two years.

 

That is a bribe, just not a 'cash' one. Obama gets a supporter in a key position in the US Senate and the Gov and his wife got various jobs and Board of Director assignments.

 
The catch was that Obama said that he should finish out his Gov. term (for two years) and then Obama would pay him off with positions for him and his wife. A bribe with a delayed fuse is still a bribe.


The Gov didn't want to wait two years and didn't like Obama's bribe offer (not because Obama didn't bribe) but because the bride Obama made was LOW. I suspect that he also didn't trust Obama to keep his word and felt that 'cash in hand' is better than a 'job in two years'. Neither of these however changes that a bribe was likely offered.

 


I think that by the time they pull in Obama's staff (David Axelrod already admitted and then recanted meeting with the Gov and one news outlet says that Obama met with the Gov on 11-5 after the election). Is it really likely that given the Gov's brazenness that he would not bring up his bribe solicitation to Pres-elect?

 

 The wiretaps however indicate that he received the bribe from Obama's folks and then rejected it as being not enough.


Offering someone something of 'value' in exchange for a political act is a bribe, even if Obama wanted to wait two years to deliver on the promise.

 

 If true, that just shows that Obama is smart enough to create some distance between the offer of the bribe and the delivery of the 'inducement' but it would not change the reality, if true, that he offered it.


That is also why Obama when asked yesterday by the press started to say 'We' and corrected himself by saying that "I" hadn't talked to anyone. He knows that his staff had conversations about it with the Gov and his aid.

 

There is a logical presumption that Obama talked to his staff about the Gov and then they talked to the Gov or the Gov's chief of staff about the positions that Obama would get the Gov and his wife IF the Gov appointed the woman to the vacant senate seat.

 
All of this is going to come out and leave Obama tarnished before he even starts his term (assuming that the Gov, his chief of staff, Jesse Jackson Jr, and the Obama folks that talked to the Gov don't turn on Obama under the District Attorney's investigation).

 

In that case, Obama could be the one going to jail.  If Obama didn't concur with offering the Gov the jobs and didn't know about it, his staff would be left violating the law and he would be forced to fire them (before he actually gets them to the White House).


If true, Obama has more in common with Nixon than Kennedy.

 

AP Article 12-15-2008 

 

Analysis: Scandal threatens to dog Obama

Governor arrested over sale of Obama's senate seat

 

WASHINGTON – President-elect Barack Obama hasn't even stepped into office and already a scandal — not of his own making — is threatening to dog him.

Obama isn't accused of anything. But the fact that Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a fellow Democrat, has been charged with trying to sell Obama's now-vacant Senate post gives political opponents an opening to criticize him. A slew of questions remain. The investigation is still under way. And the ultimate impact on Obama is far from certain.

 

Since Blagojevich's arrest, Obama has been pointedly distancing himself from the case and he took another step back on Wednesday by joining others calling for the governor's resignation.

 

A day earlier, Obama said: "I had no contact with the governor or his office, and so I was not aware of what was happening" concerning any possible dealing about Blagojevich's appointment of a successor.

 

In an interview published in the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times, Obama reiterated that point though he wouldn't answer a question on whether he was aware of any conversations between the governor and his top aides, including incoming White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel.

"It's an ongoing investigation," Obama said. "I think it would be inappropriate for me to ... remark on the situation beyond the facts that I know."

 

In Chicago on Tuesday, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald said prosecutors were making no allegations that Obama was aware of any scheming. And Blagojevich himself, in taped conversations cited by prosecutors, suggested Obama wouldn't be helpful to him. Even if the governor was to appoint a candidate favored by the Obama team, Blagojevich said, "they're not willing to give me anything except appreciation."

Republicans pounced nonetheless.

 

"The serious nature of the crimes listed by federal prosecutors raises questions about the interaction with Gov. Blagojevich, President-elect Obama and other high ranking officials who will be working for the future president," said Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, the new GOP House whip.

Added Robert M. "Mike" Duncan, chairman of the Republican National Committee, "President-elect Barack Obama's comments on the matter are insufficient at best."

 

Robert Gibbs, an Obama spokesman, said, "We did not know about this recent part of the investigation until today."

 

The two Illinois politicians have never been close and have largely operated in different Democratic Party camps in the state. Blagojevich's disdain for Obama was clear in court documents; he is quoted as calling the president-elect a vulgar term in one phone conversation recorded by the FBI.

Despite all that, at the very least, the episode amounts to a distraction for Obama just six weeks before he's sworn into office while he works to set up his new administration and deal with a national economic crisis. It also raises the specter of notorious Chicago politics, an image Obama has tried to distance himself from during his career.

 

In court documents, FBI Special Agent Daniel Cain detailed several phone calls between Blagojevich and his aides that were intercepted on court-authorized wiretaps over the past month. Blagojevich is accused of conspiring to sell or trade the vacant Senate seat for personal benefits for himself and his wife, Patti. Among his alleged desires: a Cabinet post, placement at a private foundation in a significant position, campaign contributions or an ambassadorship.

 

There were signs the continuing investigation could still involve Obama.

 

It appears that Obama friend Valerie Jarrett, an incoming senior White House adviser, is the person referred to repeatedly in court documents as "Candidate 1." That individual is described as a woman who is "an adviser to the president-elect" and as the person Obama wanted appointed to the Senate seat. Court papers say that Candidate 1 eventually removed herself from consideration for the Senate seat.

Blagojevich talked at length about Candidate 1 in a Nov. 11 phone conversation with an aide.

 

One day later, Jarrett, a Chicago businesswoman who is one of three co-chairmen of Obama's transition team and was a high-level adviser to his presidential campaign, made it known she was not interested in the seat. On Nov. 15, Obama announced that Jarrett would be a senior White House adviser and assistant for intergovernmental relations.

 

Obama's circle of major Illinois political allies and supporters is largely separate from Blagojevich's, with two major exceptions. Both Obama and Blagojevich got extensive money and support from Chicago businessman Antoin "Tony" Rezko, who is awaiting sentencing after being convicted in June on charges of using clout with Blagojevich's administration to help launch a $7 million kickback scheme. And Obama is close to Illinois Senate President Emil Jones, who has been the governor's staunchest legislative ally.

 

At least one top aide to Obama, Michael Strautmanis, previously worked for Blagojevich. Obama has appointed Strautmanis to serve in a top post in the White House. The Chicago native was legislative director and counsel to Blagojevich when the governor was a member of Congress and then helped Blagojevich win the governorship in 2002. There is no indication Strautmanis is involved in the case.

 

More details on the case could be forthcoming.

 

Court documents say they don't include all calls dealing with the governor's efforts regarding the Senate appointment. And many people in the documents are referred to by aliases; there's little doubt their identities will eventually surface.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE — Liz Sidoti covered the presidential campaign for The Associated Press and has covered national politics since 2003.

 

 

 

 

 


   

Copyright © 1999-2008 by Commissioner Bill James

http://billjames.org contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, genealogical and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on my site is distributed without profit. The fair use of a copyrighted work under this Section for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors normally considered and listed in the law include:

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
 
If you wish to use copyrighted material fromhttp://billjames.org  for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.